Wikipedia:Requests for deletion
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS
Before nominating: checks and alternatives [change source]
Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:
- A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
- The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
- The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
- Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
- B. Carry out these checks
- Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
- If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
- Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
- Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
- Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
- Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.
- C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
- If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
- If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
- If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as
{{notability}}
,{{hoax}}
,{{original research}}
, or{{advert}}
; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it. - If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
- D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
- The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
- If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
- If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.
Discussed deletion[change source]
- Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
- In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
- It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
- Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
- If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
- You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
- It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
- Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
- A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
- As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
- Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
- Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
- At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
- {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}
- Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!
If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.
Quick deletion[change source]
If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.
If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.
If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.
Notifying the user[change source]
Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~
to the bottom of their talkpage.
Discussions[change source]
- The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
- Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
- Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
- Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with
*
and sign after your comment by adding~~~~
to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one*
). - New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
- Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
- Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put
<s>
before your old idea and</s>
after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Deletekeep". - If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
- Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
- Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.
Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:
- A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
- Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
- All times are in UTC.
Current deletion request discussions[change source]
Ron Buhnik[change source]
- Ron Buhnik (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Operator873 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not sure if this musician meets the Notability threshold for inclusion. Most of the references are passing mentions or just not in-depth coverage or are questionable at best. Operator873 connect 05:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 05:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- Keep: The artist meets the notability by participating in the third season of the Eurovision show "The Next Star, the artist has a wide variety of albums very recognized in Israel, the article comes from reliable and reliable sources such as Jerusalem Post. It has also been designated as an honor guard by the IDF (Israeli Defense Force). I think the user who was not sure whether to nominate this article should have consulted first or. listen to one of their songs before giving a rating.190.219.72.75 (talk) 05:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Nikolai (nicholas iii)[change source]
- Nikolai (nicholas iii) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI generated non-encyclopedic essay, article exists elsewhere, keeping as redirect doesn't make sense even Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 00:05, 15 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
811 (number)[change source]
- 811 (number) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Redirect to 800 (number) MrMeAndMrMeTalk 14:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 04:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Daisy's Destruction[change source]
- Daisy's Destruction (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 04:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
991 (number)[change source]
- 991 (number) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Redirect to 900 (number) MrMeAndMrMeTalk 14:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 04:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Didier Guillon[change source]
- Didier Guillon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Another article that does not claim notability throughout the article. This one might be a little more dubious, since there are more sources, but there is no explanation as to why this individual is notable. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 19:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete - that is what i am leaning toward. I was not able to spot any wiki-notability in the article.--There might be arguments to be found in discussions at En-wiki:
12:24, 24 August 2023 Deb talk contribs deleted page Didier Guillon (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)
17:04, 1 February 2018 Jimfbleak talk contribs deleted page Didier Guillon (A7: Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject). 2001:2020:353:998B:C58D:D7F8:18B5:97EB (talk) 23:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- These are literally two different articles, with different text and used sources. See also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. 37.252.90.203 (talk) 11:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The article contains 30 reliable sources that are sufficient to confirm the notability of the topic. Some points from the rules that the article follows:
1. WP:GNG (If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable.).
2. WP:PEOPLE (A person can be notable if they have been written about in many published secondary sources. These must be reliable, independent of each other, and independent of the subject.).
3. WP:CREATIVE (The person's work.. (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.
4. WP:CREATIVE (The person has a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work. This work has been the subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.)
5. WP:CREATIVE (A person who fails to meet these additional standards may still be notable under Wikipedia:Notability.). 37.252.90.203 (talk) 11:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - French-wiki deleted to articles with that name.--Can cross-wiki spam be ruled out? See "9 juin 2015 à 16:20 O Kolymbitès ... a supprimé la page Didier Guillon (Ne répond pas aux critères d'admissibilité)". 2001:2020:327:B0B6:B1A0:D3A1:C2C4:50BB (talk) 11:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC) /2001:2020:353:998B:C58D:D7F8:18B5:97EB
- Further comment - i have googled the person: the hits do not indicate wiki-notability.--Perfume seller that claims to be an art expert? 2001:2020:327:B0B6:B1A0:D3A1:C2C4:50BB (talk) 11:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, upon further consideration, but some work should be done to fix some of the heavy promotion MrMeAndMrMeTalk 14:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 19:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Palazzo Galmanini Portaluppi[change source]
- Palazzo Galmanini Portaluppi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I nominate this article because it fails both verifiablity and notability. Article is largely unsourced, however only the Enciclopedia Treccani is an existing source. Casa d'abitazione a Bergamo cited under ref. nr. 2 does not exist. I am also not sure on reliability of the Treccani Enciclopedia. This page was created by Alec Smithson, a banned crosswiki vandal and spammer, who uses spam, machine translations and other covert ways of vandalism on crosswiki level. This article does not contain any usual spam, however on several occassions it does seem like he used machine translation tools to create this article. Unless importance is proven, I believe this article should be outright deleted and not only TNT'ed. A09 (talk) 17:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete because of Alec. But please note that en:Treccani is The Italian Encyclopedia, not just a random book. It is the most important Italian Encyclopedia and maybe also one of the most important European ones. Just because you have never heard of it, it does not mean that it is not reliable. It is like saying that Encyclopaedia Britannica is not reliable. Anyway, Treccani talks about the notable architect, not the palace, so let's delete the article. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 12:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Noted, thanks for explaining about the Treccani. I haven't heard about it before, hence I was sceptical. A09 (talk) 16:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I want to apologize because I read my comment again and it was very rude for no reason. I am sorry, @A09, I do not know why I got so defensive, I should have not replied so rudely. My apologies, ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 20:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- It’s okay, I understand. No need to apologise, A09 (talk) 21:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I want to apologize because I read my comment again and it was very rude for no reason. I am sorry, @A09, I do not know why I got so defensive, I should have not replied so rudely. My apologies, ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 20:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Noted, thanks for explaining about the Treccani. I haven't heard about it before, hence I was sceptical. A09 (talk) 16:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Xabier Lezama[change source]
- Xabier Lezama (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
MrMeAndMrMe has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: promotional, and not notable, the only sources of which seem to be not very reliable. Deleted on many other languages, including de, en, etc MrMeAndMrMeTalk 16:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 16:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Corso di Porta Romana[change source]
- Corso di Porta Romana (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I nomminate this article for deletion as it does not prove it's notable in any way. The only cited source is not accessible, even if we disregard its incomplete citation. This page was created by Alec Smithson, a long term crosswiki abuser. Article does not contain spam at the moment, however per some features in the text I strongly believe it has been created by help of machine translation tool (see phrases like the center Milan of the HNWI (High Net Worth Individual) upper class). If community opposes the hard deletion, I suggest soft deleting it and rewriting it per principles of TNT. A09 (talk) 09:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Hard Delete, is what i am leaning toward. Not okay English, seems Machine-translatish. 2001:2020:353:998B:7D7B:EB6:83A0:1529 (talk) 01:27, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, but then start it again, if needed, as a redirect to Porta Romana (Milan) (the road is named after it). About notability, it is a very important and notable road here in Italy, but I do not know if it fits Simple English Wikipedia's notability criteria or not. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 01:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 09:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Tyler Antonius (2nd nomination)[change source]
- Tyler Antonius (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I am starting this RFD per the recent QD rejection. My question is very simple: What are the improvements since Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Tyler Antonıus, Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2024/Tyler_Antonius, and Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2023/Tyler_Antonius? MathXplore (talk) 02:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete: unsourced JoshuaAuble (talk) 01:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have moved the opinion to the discussion section. MathXplore (talk) 00:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - it is not an encyclopedia article. It is not even close to that.--Please put wikipedia-readers out of their misery, and make the "article" disappear. 2001:2020:313:ACDE:18D6:F80A:FA63:50EA (talk) 04:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete, that is what i am leaning toward. Seems like not wiki-notable.--It does not look like En-wiki can help us with arguments: "12:57, 23 March 2022 Praxidicae talk contribs moved page Tyler Antonius to Draft:Tyler Antonius over a redirect without leaving a redirect (Not ready for mainspace, incubate in draftspace (via script)).
14:18, 11 March 2022 Praxidicae talk contribs moved page Tyler Antonius to Draft:Tyler Antonius over a redirect without leaving a redirect (Not ready for mainspace, incubate in draftspace (via script))". 2001:2020:319:BC56:1556:D0C1:6BB9:1615 (talk) 16:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Besides, the article does not seem presentable in an encyclopedia. 2001:2020:319:BC56:1556:D0C1:6BB9:1615 (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Quick Delete a G4 case. Truse45 (talk) 00:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- As explained above, another admin has denied QD enforcement. Therefore, the case has been redirected here. MathXplore (talk) 00:32, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- (Note) This is the user's first edit. MathXplore (talk) 00:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 02:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Le puta[change source]
2803:7780:3C:A28:2CA8:FB3D:7CFE:9D34 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: seems like a hoax. 2803:7780:3C:A28:2CA8:FB3D:7CFE:9D34 (talk) 20:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Quick Delete A1 or A4 Dream Indigo 23:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Quick Delete A1.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Quick Delete A1 and A4. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Quick Delete I was the creator of the page, It’s an hoax that was also created in the Spanish Wikipedia and got also deleted. 2803:7780:3C:A28:CD6C:6E35:E4F9:DB17 (talk) 00:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 20:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Palace Malchiodi[change source]
- Palace Malchiodi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article should be deleted because of weak sourcing. First reference (Casabella) is entirely made up, next two are apparently real. Even more fake sources can be found in the bibliography section, where, besides the first two entries, which aren't reliable sources, only three are real, other are fabricated. This article was created by Alec Smithson, which is known for inserting made up/hoax content as well as crosswiki spam and machine translation. I do not recall of any spam on this particular page, however can find numerous proofs of using machine translation tools when creating this page. This may be observed in some weird word sequences, wrong prepositions as well as other grammatical slips through the article. A09 (talk) 21:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete Per nom. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 12:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Palace Maffezzoli (Milan)[change source]
- Palace Maffezzoli (Milan) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I nominate this article for deletion since it presents a form of covered vandalism made by Alec Smithson, a known crosswiki long term abuser. This article might seem a tad better than some other, however after checking entries in 'Bibliography' section I came to a conclusion only real book that ever existed is Bertelli G., Brambilla M., Invernizzi M., Bergamo. Cent'anni d'architettura 1890-1990, Bergamo 1994, pp. 76-77. I could not find bibliographical data for other entries on the list. Thus we can establish an argument cited sources are hoaxes, which makes the article fail verifiability. Another giveaway of this user is usage of machine translation, some indices are present in this article as well: 'Execution' and other proper names that should be translated but weren't due to sloppy editing. As only one real source is present at the moment, I believe this article should be deleted and not TNT-ed. A09 (talk) 20:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete (TNT), per nominator. 2001:2020:353:998B:194B:CE18:494:336B (talk) 01:31, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- So you believe there are enough sources to rewrite an article on their bassis? A09 (talk) 08:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: If it was created by an LTA then it really should be G5'd.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:52, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Fr33kman rejected my speedy nomination and pointed me to RfD. A09 (talk) 08:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- huh. In that case Delete.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Fr33kman rejected my speedy nomination and pointed me to RfD. A09 (talk) 08:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 13:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 20:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Quadronno District[change source]
- Quadronno District (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article should be deleted per TNT rule. It has many flaws, the most eye soring is the article being unsourced, as well as its bad grammar. It was created by Alec Smithson, a crosswiki long term abuser, who is known for inserting spam as well as machine translated text. Spam is contained in "Other websites" paragraph, where these links were spammed in mass before. To suppport my theory about the article being a machine translation are weird occurences of 'Quartiere Quadronno', which the automated tool did not recognise as an Italian proper name and literally repeated it. I think we don't need such substandard article. A09 (talk) 20:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete Deleted three times on it-wiki because it fails notability and because it was created by that LTA (it:Quadronno). ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 12:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 20:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Corso Italia[change source]
- Corso Italia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A09 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I believe this page should be deleted per TNT. Page is wholly unsourced, so we can expect factual mistakes. Furthermore, this page was created by a certain crosswiki long term abuser, which creates autotranslated stubs en-masse without proper care for wikification/sourcing etc. Per some of the sentences (part of the prestigious and exclusive Quadronno district of the of the HNWI (High Net Worth Individual) upper class) I believe this page is autotranslated as well as contains spam (Real estate market, which was spammed on multiple settlement articles on crosswiki bassis). Another dead giveaway this page was created by aforementioned LTA is the Related pages section, which contains links to his other work here on simplewiki. A09 (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete - that is what i am leaning toward.--Not encyclopedic. No source.--Nuke the article is okay. 2001:2020:353:998B:7D7B:EB6:83A0:1529 (talk) 01:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Alec has been trying to create this article since 2017, see it:Corso Italia (Milano). ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 12:52, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 20:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Mughal–Safavid wars[change source]
- Mughal–Safavid wars (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Operator873 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A random list of conflicts and really isn't needed. Operator873 connect 20:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Searching with that title, I essentially get two conflicts, one in 1622/23 (see en:Mughal–Safavid war (1622–1623)) and the other roughly 30 years later (en:Mughal–Safavid war (1649–1653)). Given that both are rougly a generation apart, I think we need to have stubs for both. We can then turn this into a disambiguation page, but likely thats overkil..--Eptalon (talk) 21:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 20:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Out of India theory[change source]
- Out of India theory (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Clearly AI generated non-encyclopedic, non-wikified, essay. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 23:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Comment: another case of macdonald-ross G2'ing pages listed at RfD.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 23:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Capture of Kabul[change source]
- Capture of Kabul (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Cyber.Eyes.2005 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Subject likely fails notability and WP:GNG. The title 'Siege of Kabul/Capture of Kabul' is problematic because this event has not occurred a single time; Kabul has been captured by the Mughals (more than a single time), Taliban, Russians, and others. EnWiki has a list of these events. No date or year of the battle has been mentioned in the article, and important parts of the article depend on single sources. The sections 'Battle,' 'Aftermath,' and the lead are supported by single references, some of which only mention the battle without providing any details. I don't think this subject needs a standalone article. Additionally, the terms 'Hindustan' and 'Hindustani' have been used frequently, which may constitute WP:POV since 'Hindustan' refers only to the modern state of India today. – Cyber.Eyes2005Talk 12:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- The article matches notability. It mentions this event as "Capture /occupation of Kabul" in several instances.
"Akbar immediately sent an army under Raja Man Singh to occupy Kabul and then brought the city and its surrounding districts under direct imperial administration. This task completed"[1]
Moreover, Here too "Occupation of Kabul" is mentioned specifically (word to word)[2]
So if we name the article "Occupation of Kabul" instead of deleting it then the article indeed will be notable and it will pass WP:GNG.
- "Kabul has been captured by the Mughals, Taliban, Russians, and others."
- And this is a Mughal campaign? I agree Mughals have captured kabul several times, But this occupation of Kabul took place in 1585-1586. And as for the term "Hindustani". It was essentially used for the Mughal troops and Mughal empire. As the empire expanded, So did "Hindustan"[3]
As for your other questions regarding date, The date is between 1585-1586 as per the source.[4][5] Malik-Al-Hind (talk) 12:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: User:Malik-Al-Hind has provided two references regarding the dates. The first source states:
"In 1585, Akbar transferred his capital to Lahore in the Punjab at the death of his half-brother, Mirza Muhammad Hakim, at Kabul,"
and"In 1586, Akbar and the Uzbek Khan negotiated a pact in which Akbar agreed to remain neutral during the Uzbek invasion of Safavid-held Khurasan."
The second source mentions a number of events regarding the date 1586:"Large forces under Zain Khan Koka and other officers swept the plains and drove the Yusufzai clansmen into their rocky fastnesses (January 1586)."
None of these sources mention the siege or occupation of Kabul between 1585-1586. It seems like an assumption that the occupation happened after 1585, which makes it WP:SYNTH and WP:OR. – Cyber.Eyes2005Talk 14:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)- This is nowhere "Original research"
- Look closely what my first source says:
In 1585 Akbar transferred his capital to Lahore in the Punjab at the death of his half-brother, Mirza Muhammad Hakim, at Kabul. The Uzbek ruler, Abdullah Khan, who had annexed Badakhshan in 1584, was a possible threat to Kabul. The Uzbeks were subsidizing the Afghan tribes in their continuing defiance of the Mughal regime at Kabul. Akbar immediately sent an army under Raja Man Singh to occupy Kabul
- u can clearly see Akbar shifted his capital in "1585" to lahore and sent man singh to "Occupy kabul" here. It's obvious to any reader that the event was of 1585.
Moreover You have greatly cherrypicked my 2nd source haven't you?
It specifically says:
Large forces under Zain Khan Koka and other officers swept the plains and drove the Yusufzai clansmen into their rocky fastnesses (January, 1586). But soon afterwards a terrible blow fell on the Mughal army which had penetrated into the hills. There were quarrels be- tween its leaders, Zain Khan, Birbal and Abul Fath. On 16th February, (1586), during a disorderly march, the Afghans attacked it in a Swat defile. Panic seized the disunited Imperial army and 8000 men lost their lives, including Rajah Birbal and many other high officers, while all their camp and equipage were plundered. The fugitives straggling in the hills were cut off. The news of the disaster reached Akbar in two days and prompt steps were taken to retrieve it. An army under Rajah Todar Mal crossed the Indus and the Kabul rivers the next day to suppress the Yusufzais.
You can clearly see that Afghans had killed Birbal in 1586 because of Which, "2 days later" Akbar sends Raja todarmal to punish the Yusufzais. Again here too it is very obvious that the siege took place in 1586.
- Moreover, to end this discussion once and for all,here is what my Second source
- Says:
"The situation changed after Tahmasp's death 1576 with the Akbar's Occupation of Kabul in 1585"
- Again "Occupation of Kabul in 1585".
-Page 332 Here it specifically mentions "Occupation of Kabul 1585".
- So it passes WP:Notability and WP:GNG.¥
So yes I agree kabul was sieged many times from the reign of babur to humayun to Akbar to even Jahangir and Shah jahan. But my article specifically talks about the The siege which took place between 1585-1586 which is very notable.
Malik-Al-Hind (talk) 14:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: If I look at en:Mughal Empire, I find no date in the 1680s, associated with a "Fall of Kabul"; there seems to have been a siege in 1605 or 1607, and all the remaining "fall of Kabul" are associated with most ecent history of Afghanistan (that is: 2002, 2022, perhaps somewhere earlier in the 1980s). I am not against keeping a properly-sourced article, though..--Eptalon (talk) 21:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The conflict is not from 1680s rather 1580s, During the reign of akbar. There is no seperate article made for campaign yet. But this battle is surely the aftermath of en:Battle of the Malandari Pass (1586), Where Akbar sends Raja todarmal and Raja Man Singh to re-capture kabul and "punish" the Yusufzai pashtuns. This is why I made it here. But yes, the article is well sourced and notable. "Occupation of Kabul 1585" is specifically mentioned in several sources which I gave.
It passes WP:Notability and WP:GNG, Which Cyber eyes thought it didn't and hence he requested it for deletion.
The second allegation of his was the article provides no date. Well the dates of the battle varies. From "1585" to "1586". But it definetly took place between 1585-1586. This is a scholarly agreed date. And this is for sure that by 1586, Man singh and Raja todarmal had occupied kabul. [6] Malik-Al-Hind (talk) 04:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: G2'd by macdonald-ross.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 12:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Mackenzie Shirilla[change source]
- Mackenzie Shirilla (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Operator873 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Being a criminal isn't notable Operator873 connect 17:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Unfortunately, murders do happen, and this one got quitte a bit of media attention. I do however have to say what I said with the other article I nominated: the article should be about the murder case, and not about the murderer. So, either we get the material together, and write about the murder case (verdict: life in prison) or we don't. In any case, we should delete this article, perhaps after merging some of the content elsewhere --Eptalon (talk) 18:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. We are better off starting over, so I deleted the page--Eptalon (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Comparison of Islamic and Jewish dietary laws[change source]
- Comparison of Islamic and Jewish dietary laws (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI generated nonsense Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- There is an article en:Comparison of Islamic and Jewish dietary laws, there are also corresponding articles in Arabic, Persian and other languages. If wanted, we could 'translate' the EnWP article properly, pointing out similarirties and diferences. The article we currently have is clearly not up to any satandard; and if it hasn't been imporved by the time this closes, it is easily deleted. Given that there are similar versions in English, and other languages, I think we should try to fix it so it becomes keepable, though.--Eptalon (talk) 21:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Likely what we have is a 'translation' of one section of the Engglish page. --Eptalon (talk) 22:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
[change source]
- Template:Los Angeles Rams roster navbox (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: 98% redlinks, not too much use Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Comment: macdonald-ross G2'd the page.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Windows 11 editions[change source]
- Windows 11 editions (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Redirect - I've merged the content into Windows 11, ENs version at en:Windows 11 editions also redirects back to Windows 11. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reverted- @Davey2010: When an article is under discussion, it's best to wait for the outcome before taking action to resolve anything,. -- Auntof6 (talk) 14:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Merged reverted. Merge because it's content that is missing from the article and is content that is in the EN article en:Windows_11#Versions anyway. –Davey2010Talk 15:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just merge it with the Simple English wiki page of Windows 11, just merge it, i dont care anymore. USER9646 (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @USER9646, Please read WP:Notability - In short if your article was similar to en:Windows 10 editions then it'd be a different ball game but as your article contains no sources and doesn't explain why this list warrants a seperate article it obviously makes sense to have it all in one article ? ....,
- You're more than welcome to source it and show it's notable for an article, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Then delete it, i am lazy. USER9646 (talk) 21:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @USER9646 So you come here in a huff because it's up for deletion but then you state you're too lazy to source it anyway .... the mind boggles. –Davey2010Talk 21:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just delete it, i dont care abut this wiki site anymore. USER9646 (talk) 21:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Don't get upset. RFD doesn't mean we don't treasure your contribution, just mean that this page is not appropriate. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just delete it, i dont care abut this wiki site anymore. USER9646 (talk) 21:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @USER9646 So you come here in a huff because it's up for deletion but then you state you're too lazy to source it anyway .... the mind boggles. –Davey2010Talk 21:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Then delete it, i am lazy. USER9646 (talk) 21:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just merge it with the Simple English wiki page of Windows 11, just merge it, i dont care anymore. USER9646 (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Merged reverted. Merge because it's content that is missing from the article and is content that is in the EN article en:Windows_11#Versions anyway. –Davey2010Talk 15:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Davey2010: When an article is under discussion, it's best to wait for the outcome before taking action to resolve anything,. -- Auntof6 (talk) 14:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Easiest Merge of my life. I will note that the redirect that en has also includes the redirects with possibilities tag and a de-facto abandoned draft exists at en for en:Draft:Windows 11 editions.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 15:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 14:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
The four calligraphy masters from the Song Dynasty[change source]
- The four calligraphy masters from the Song Dynasty (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 10:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
The article is pretty weak, but it sounds like a notable topic. Rathfelder (talk) 22:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 10:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Dele Kelvin Oye[change source]
- Dele Kelvin Oye (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable lawyer - Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. Also created by a globally-banned sock, RFD'ing in case others may find things I haven't, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Isnt the President of the Nigerian Association of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Mines, and Agriculture notable?Rathfelder (talk) 21:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- The EN article was draftified, I'll be honest I don't know but looking at the sources it does appear to be a notable role, As it was created by a globally banned sock I'll keep it open for the time being in case others believe it should be deleted (i'm not fussed and if it goes to keep i'll happily withdraw this), Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 21:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 20:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
Recently closed deletion discussions[change source]
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Clear consensus to keep. Operator873 connect 05:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
One Thing Remains[change source]
- One Thing Remains (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 09:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Keep The article itself is too short and should be expanded, but the album is notable. Dream Indigo 00:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - Exists at en:One Thing Remains. en:WP:SOFIXIT. –Davey2010Talk 14:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - It doesn't fail WP:GNG, and while this is very short, that's not a reason to delete, that's a reason to improve the article! Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 09:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. If the lead clearly states the person is unknown, I don't see how notability can be established or supported. Operator873 connect 05:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Kurt Wiehle[change source]
- Kurt Wiehle (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Potential hoax, no reliable coverage, unsourced. I cannot find any information about this person. He is mentioned on enwiki, but nothing beyond that. Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 15:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Keep. I can see quite a lot of sources which mention him. Rathfelder (talk) 21:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Only found this and this, I've not found anything else - No evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. The template was copy/pasted and broken anyone. Not sure why people don't understand it's unsafe to do that. Operator873 connect 05:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Template:Homicide[change source]
- Template:Homicide (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused template, I don't really know if these sort of templates would be considered complex?, The words are certainly complex but they can be fixed but not sure on the templates themselves, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010Talk 15:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Comment. Maybe it would be better to move this template to Template:Murder if it is kept.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Adding the template to these articles is a pretty quick change, and it is very useful. It would not be complex, either, as if you don't understand what the word means, you click the link, and then learn. The only thing that can be simplified here are the two mentions of "varies by jursidiction". Also, homicide is an umbrella term for killing a person, so murder would be an incorrect term. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 18:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- I follow Wikipedia:BASIC English alphabetical wordlist and none of the words on the template are there however the articles obviously exist, To me adding these templates with these big words just takes the Simple away and I guess it becomes more of a enwiki duplicate, Maybe I'm over analysing it, Just overcomplicates articles imho, –Davey2010Talk 19:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- In my opinion, the BASIC English alphabetical word list is a list that can be used to describe complex words. The point of simple wikipedia is to explain complex topics. Becoming an enwiki duplicate is not really an issue here, because if we did not want to become and en duplicate, we could make other changes such as making actual changes to the template. Templates such as these are helpful for navigation, however, and without them, the quality of the wiki is reduced. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 15:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's a fair point, I also assumed titles had to be Simple too but I guess not, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- In my opinion, the BASIC English alphabetical word list is a list that can be used to describe complex words. The point of simple wikipedia is to explain complex topics. Becoming an enwiki duplicate is not really an issue here, because if we did not want to become and en duplicate, we could make other changes such as making actual changes to the template. Templates such as these are helpful for navigation, however, and without them, the quality of the wiki is reduced. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 15:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I follow Wikipedia:BASIC English alphabetical wordlist and none of the words on the template are there however the articles obviously exist, To me adding these templates with these big words just takes the Simple away and I guess it becomes more of a enwiki duplicate, Maybe I'm over analysing it, Just overcomplicates articles imho, –Davey2010Talk 19:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 15:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. MathXplore (talk) 01:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Adolescent’s Orquesta[change source]
- Adolescent’s Orquesta (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Spagooder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Already discussed on main English WP, where the article was deleted - issues included lack of notability, lack of reliable sourcing, and promotional content/conflict of interest editing. Spagooder (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Keep - Has won various notable awards[1] (en:New York Latin ACE Awards? and en:Golden Globes?), –Davey2010Talk 20:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)- The group still fails notability guidelines. Those New York Latin ACE awards are not a major music award (and I'd argue they're not notable either) and those are the wrong Golden Globes. The Golden Globes are film and television awards, they don't have a salsa music category, and I was unable to find info on what their "golden globe" award is. Info on the group should not be taken at face value considering the COI/promotional editing that has been done on their part. Spagooder (talk) 16:19, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - Yeah I can't find anything that confirms these were awarded - makes you wonder if these were made up in order to keep the article around, Anyway agree there's no notability here. –Davey2010Talk 17:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The group still fails notability guidelines. Those New York Latin ACE awards are not a major music award (and I'd argue they're not notable either) and those are the wrong Golden Globes. The Golden Globes are film and television awards, they don't have a salsa music category, and I was unable to find info on what their "golden globe" award is. Info on the group should not be taken at face value considering the COI/promotional editing that has been done on their part. Spagooder (talk) 16:19, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: macdonald-ross A4'd the page.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 19:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QD G5 MathXplore (talk) 01:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Austin Powers discography[change source]
- Austin Powers discography (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
William Graham has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Implausible redirect. William Graham (talk) 17:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Tagged as G5 "created by sock" - some of their redirects may be legit but given the false articles the've created I don't hold much confidence in these being legit. Can always be created by editors in good standing. –Davey2010Talk 17:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Already quickly deleted as WP:G5@William Graham Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 11:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QD G5 MathXplore (talk) 01:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
James Bond (group)[change source]
- James Bond (group) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
William Graham has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Implausible redirect. William Graham (talk) 17:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Tagged as G5 "created by sock" - some of their redirects may be legit but given the false articles the've created I don't hold much confidence in these being legit. Can always be created by editors in good standing. –Davey2010Talk 17:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Already quickly deleted as WP:G5 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 11:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QD G5 MathXplore (talk) 01:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
We da Best Forever[change source]
- We da Best Forever (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
William Graham has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Implausible redirection. Article name is DJ Khalid song and redirect is to different musician. William Graham (talk) 17:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Already quickly deleted as WP:G5 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 11:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 17:32, 8 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. QD A1 MathXplore (talk) 01:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Today it’s my Birthday[change source]
- Today it’s my Birthday (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
2803:7780:3C:A28:647D:4B74:AB14:A1DF has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: seems not encyclopedic 2803:7780:3C:A28:647D:4B74:AB14:A1DF (talk) 21:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Already QDed MrMeAndMrMeTalk 00:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 21:07, 15 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Redirected to Murder of Tristyn Bailey. Closing somewhat early as the article had been deleted by Macdonald-Ross whilst this RFD was still going - no one so far had objected to redirecting and I doubt it would garner anymore !votes so closing, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:32, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Aiden Fucci[change source]
- Aiden Fucci (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: 14-year old, born 2004, in Florida, who killed a 13-year old girl, in 2021. Personally, I think than no matter what the verdict of this is, the interest of this should be the murder case, which enwp has at en:Murder of Tristyn Bailey. Other than that, here in Europe there are special laws that protect junvenile delinquents (amongst others: giving them a new name, when they served their sentence). In this respect, I think, this page should be deleted; if we have a page on Wiki, it should be about the murder, and not the murderer. Eptalon (talk) 18:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Delete per nom - The murder is notable however the oxygen thief himself isn't. –Davey2010Talk 18:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)- Redirect as per below, makes sense, –Davey2010Talk 10:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I have brought over Murder of Tristyn Bailey, which is the article about the murder case. It is very basic at the moment, but can be extended if neeed. Of ocurse, if the murder isn't deemed notable, it can be deleted as well; that's up to the closing admin to decide.--Eptalon (talk) 19:17, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- weak Redirect to Murder of Tristyn Bailey. If the only real thing notable about the person is one murder, the page would be better as a redirect.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:47, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: (for some reason) macdonals-ross A4'd the page.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why does Macdonald-Ross keep QDing these pages while they are still being discussed? These are not always non-controversial deletes. MrMeAndMrMeTalk 21:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 18:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Too generic for a simple redirect; not opposed to the page being recreated as a disambiguation page...--Eptalon (talk) 11:40, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
T.T.G.[change source]
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This could mean so many things that having it as a redirect is meaningless and will do more harm than good. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- We should not have redirects from acronyms except in the most exceptional cases. Rathfelder (talk) 22:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, but change to dab page. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is going to be a lot of things to disambigute from@Auntof6 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Me Da Wikipedian: That shouldn't be a problem, although the enwiki page has only 8 entries. -- Auntof6 (talk) 22:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is going to be a lot of things to disambigute from@Auntof6 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 00:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Too generic for a redirect, so deleted. Not opposed to it being repalced with a disambiguation page...--Eptalon (talk) 11:38, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
T.T.[change source]
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This could mean so many things that having it as a redirect is meaningless and will do more harm than good. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
- Delete to generic.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 17:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, but change to dab page. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 00:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Uncommon abbreviation, redirected somewhere.--Eptalon (talk) 19:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
K.O.Y.[change source]
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: per below Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 21:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Redirect of uncommon abbreviation, no comments...--Eptalon (talk) 19:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
D.F.Y.[change source]
Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Too ambigious, could mean a whole lot of things Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
This request is due to close on 21:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Interesting article, unfurotunately without any references. A quuick internet search also doesn't yield much. So, this is a delete...--Eptalon (talk) 19:00, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Šeina Grama[change source]
- Šeina Grama (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 09:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.
Discussion[change source]
Needs references, but is notaable. Rathfelder (talk) 22:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This request is due to close on 09:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
Related pages[change source]
- All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
- Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
- Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
- Wikipedia:Deletion policy
- Wikipedia:Quick deletion
- Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
- Category:Deletion requests
- Category:Quick deletion requests
- ↑ Richards, John (2000). The Mughal empire. ISBN 9781932705546. Retrieved 2000.
{{cite book}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ↑ K. Palat, Madhavan (2000). History of Civilizations of Central Asia, UNESCO. ISBN 9781932705546. Retrieved 2000.
{{cite book}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help); Unknown parameter|Page=
ignored (|page=
suggested) (help) - ↑ Vanina, Eugenia (2012). Medieval Indian Mindscapes: Space, Time, Society, Man. Primus Books. p. 47. ISBN 978-93-80607-19-1 – via Google Books.
- ↑ Richards, John (2000). The Mughal empire. ISBN 9781932705546. Retrieved 2000.
{{cite book}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ↑ Sarkaar, Jadunath (2019-08-06). History of Jaipur. Invincible Publishers. ISBN 978-81-936662-0-3.
- ↑ Sarkaar, Jadunath (2019-08-06). History of Jaipur. Invincible Publishers. ISBN 978-81-936662-0-3.