Talk:Artificial intelligence

Critique[change source]

Complex and long-winded. Overall, follows the sources too closely thereby picking up much of their complexity. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Not a Simple idea[change source]

"An extreme goal of ...".--Not a Simple idea.--Please change that (while i fix other articles). 2001:2020:345:C41E:54C3:9833:4807:B18D (talk) 09:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"At least some of the things we associate with other minds, such as" ... . 2001:2020:303:B36B:7054:9E3D:B0E3:299E (talk) 18:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Things to consider when extending..[change source]

This article has existed since 2004. It may be one of the oldest article this Wikipedia has. I know that people talk about "artificial intelligence" a lot recently. So anyone extending or changing the article, please keep in mind:

We write in simple language. When you add things, try to use language that is easy to understand. You can use specific vocabulary you need, but try to explain or define the terms you use.
In the end, this will likely be an overview article, linking to more specific articles.
Good sources are useful. Press releases usually don't make good sources.

Eptalon (talk) 18:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"AGI" seems unmentioned[change source]

Artificial general intelligence (or AGI), is (a idea or) hypothetical technology. Thoughts? 2001:2020:31B:B8E1:2D0E:8376:B0EB:651F (talk) 18:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

EnWp uses the term "Generative Artificial Intelligence". en:Generative artificial intelligence. If you introduce it in the article you'll create a red-link. Have you thoght about how do explain it in simple langage? Eptalon (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While we don't mind redlinks on this project, I agree with Eptalon wherein it will be especially difficult to in simple English the complex ideas of generative AI. This is why I removed the mention until such time as a talented editor is able to create an appropriate article. Operator873 ^connect 19:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_general_intelligence . That is
[[Artificial general intelligence (or AGI).--Not the same as Generative artificial intelligence]]. 2001:2020:31B:B8E1:5F5:4AA8:1FE3:DD2B (talk) 20:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

True, the same as above applies though: If you add a link to this article, can you find a good way of defining it,in simple language. As to the subject itself: I don't believe it will happen in the next decade... Eptalon (talk) 20:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been locked for six months (for IPs).--Y'all might want to work on the first sentence (in the lede), first.--Thank you for user:Eptalon's suggestion, anyway - i will keep the suggestion in mind, in case i edit the article next year. 2001:2020:31B:B8E1:796F:99B2:7E23:DF89 (talk) 22:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)/ 2001:2020:31B:B8E1:5F5:4AA8:1FE3:DD2B[reply]

Say it ain't so[change source]

Is the following an okay first sentence, i ask rhetorically:
"Artificial intelligence (AI or A.I.) is a computer program or a machine that is able to learn and mimic human cognition". 2001:2020:31B:B8E1:D00C:16B4:9112:DE24 (talk) 22:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rhetorically, yes. It's ok. Much better than  what I don't like. Don't you think? By the way, that's bad form on any project and I left you a warning on WP:ANI about it too. Operator873 ^connect 01:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]